Thank you for the review. > On June 14, 2020 11:31 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - pm_runtime_get_sync(pd->dev); > > + if (!pd->atomic_xfer) > > + pm_runtime_get_sync(pd->dev); > > This was a small surprise to me. I assume RPM is disabled that late? > But can we be sure the clock is on, then? Turns out it's unnecessary to mess with PM handling here. I assumed that it must not be touched during atomic transfers, but that seems not to be the case. I'll drop that bit in the next revision. CU Uli
