Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:50 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > After removing the first hunk, this works fine on r8a7791/koelsch.
>
> Removing the first hunk? This one?
>
> + bool atomic_xfer;
Oops, no. I hadn't looked that close at the numbers, and assumed the failure
was about the first hunk:
Hunk #3 FAILED at 369.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 432 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 585 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 643 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 666 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 717 (offset -3 lines).
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c.rej
I meant the one with the "data" var.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
