Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] media: rcar-csi2: Negotiate data lanes number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kieran,

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:40:42AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On 15/06/2020 09:43, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:34:06AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> Hi Jacopo,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>> Use the newly introduced get_mbus_config() subdevice pad operation to
> >>> retrieve the remote subdevice MIPI CSI-2 bus configuration and configure
> >>> the number of active data lanes accordingly.
> >>>
> >>> In order to be able to call the remote subdevice operation cache the
> >>> index of the remote pad connected to the single CSI-2 input port.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> >>> index 151e6a90c5fb..11769f004fd8 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-csi2.c
> >>> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ struct rcar_csi2 {
> >>>  	struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
> >>>  	struct v4l2_async_subdev asd;
> >>>  	struct v4l2_subdev *remote;
> >>> +	unsigned int remote_pad;
> >>>
> >>>  	struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt mf;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -371,6 +372,7 @@ struct rcar_csi2 {
> >>>
> >>>  	unsigned short lanes;
> >>>  	unsigned char lane_swap[4];
> >>> +	unsigned short active_lanes;
> >>
> >> Do you need this? I.e. should you not always request this from the
> >> transmitter device?
> >
> > It's actually the other way around. The receiver queries the
> > transmitter to know how many data lanes it intends to use and adjusts
> > its configuration to accommodate it.
> >
> >>
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>>  static inline struct rcar_csi2 *sd_to_csi2(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >>> @@ -414,7 +416,7 @@ static int rcsi2_wait_phy_start(struct rcar_csi2 *priv)
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Wait for the clock and data lanes to enter LP-11 state. */
> >>>  	for (timeout = 0; timeout <= 20; timeout++) {
> >>> -		const u32 lane_mask = (1 << priv->lanes) - 1;
> >>> +		const u32 lane_mask = (1 << priv->active_lanes) - 1;
> >>>
> >>>  		if ((rcsi2_read(priv, PHCLM_REG) & PHCLM_STOPSTATECKL)  &&
> >>>  		    (rcsi2_read(priv, PHDLM_REG) & lane_mask) == lane_mask)
> >>> @@ -471,11 +473,57 @@ static int rcsi2_calc_mbps(struct rcar_csi2 *priv, unsigned int bpp)
> >>>  	 * bps = link_freq * 2
> >>>  	 */
> >>>  	mbps = v4l2_ctrl_g_ctrl_int64(ctrl) * bpp;
> >>> -	do_div(mbps, priv->lanes * 1000000);
> >>> +	do_div(mbps, priv->active_lanes * 1000000);
> >>>
> >>>  	return mbps;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> +static int rcsi2_config_active_lanes(struct rcar_csi2 *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct v4l2_mbus_config mbus_config = { 0 };
> >>> +	unsigned int num_lanes = (-1U);
> >>> +	int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +	priv->active_lanes = priv->lanes;
> >>> +	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(priv->remote, pad, get_mbus_config,
> >>> +			       priv->remote_pad, &mbus_config);
> >>> +	if (ret == -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
> >>> +		dev_dbg(priv->dev, "No remote mbus configuration available\n");
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (ret) {
> >>> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get remote mbus configuration\n");
> >>> +		return ret;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (mbus_config.type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> >>> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Unsupported media bus type %u\n",
> >>> +			mbus_config.type);
> >>> +		return -EINVAL;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (mbus_config.flags & V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_1_LANE)
> >>> +		num_lanes = 1;
> >>> +	else if (mbus_config.flags & V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_2_LANE)
> >>> +		num_lanes = 2;
> >>> +	else if (mbus_config.flags & V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_3_LANE)
> >>> +		num_lanes = 3;
> >>> +	else if (mbus_config.flags & V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_4_LANE)
> >>> +		num_lanes = 4;
> >>
> >> This is the downside of using flags... Anyway, I guess this is certainly
> >> fine now.
> >>
> >
> > Let's change this on top, if we like to (and I would like to :)
>
> That answers my question then ;-)
>

There's been a discussion on one of the first version of the series
where I tried replacing flags and introduced a union of structures
with fields, most likely similar to what you suggested.

Based on the received comments I decided to use the existing
V4L2_MBUS_* flags to ease the replacement of the video ops
g|s_mbus_config() to minimize the changes. We could then on top
replace flags.

Thanks
  j

> --
> Kieran
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >   j
> >
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (num_lanes > priv->lanes) {
> >>> +		dev_err(priv->dev,
> >>> +			"Unsupported mbus config: too many data lanes %u\n",
> >>> +			num_lanes);
> >>> +		return -EINVAL;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	priv->active_lanes = num_lanes;
> >>> +
> >>> +	return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>  static int rcsi2_start_receiver(struct rcar_csi2 *priv)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	const struct rcar_csi2_format *format;
> >>> @@ -490,6 +538,11 @@ static int rcsi2_start_receiver(struct rcar_csi2 *priv)
> >>>  	/* Code is validated in set_fmt. */
> >>>  	format = rcsi2_code_to_fmt(priv->mf.code);
> >>>
> >>> +	/* Get the remote mbus config to get the number of enabled lanes. */
> >>> +	ret = rcsi2_config_active_lanes(priv);
> >>> +	if (ret)
> >>> +		return ret;
> >>> +
> >>>  	/*
> >>>  	 * Enable all supported CSI-2 channels with virtual channel and
> >>>  	 * data type matching.
> >>> @@ -522,7 +575,7 @@ static int rcsi2_start_receiver(struct rcar_csi2 *priv)
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>>  	phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK;
> >>> -	phycnt |= (1 << priv->lanes) - 1;
> >>> +	phycnt |= (1 << priv->active_lanes) - 1;
> >>>
> >>>  	mbps = rcsi2_calc_mbps(priv, format->bpp);
> >>>  	if (mbps < 0)
> >>> @@ -748,6 +801,7 @@ static int rcsi2_notify_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>>  	priv->remote = subdev;
> >>> +	priv->remote_pad = pad;
> >>>
> >>>  	dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Bound %s pad: %d\n", subdev->name, pad);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -793,6 +847,7 @@ static int rcsi2_parse_v4l2(struct rcar_csi2 *priv,
> >>>  			priv->lanes);
> >>>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>>  	}
> >>> +	priv->active_lanes = priv->lanes;
> >>>
> >>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->lane_swap); i++) {
> >>>  		priv->lane_swap[i] = i < priv->lanes ?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Sakari Ailus
>
> --
> Regards
> --
> Kieran



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux