Hi Mark,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:08 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > To repeat my previous feedback I'd expect a driver update as well.
>
> > No driver update is needed.
>
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml says:
>
> I'm much more comfortable explicitly listing the new compatible so that
> even if someone makes a DT that doesn't bother listing the fallbacks
> things will work.
Adding all of them would cause even more churn when adding support for
a new SoC... There are already more than 700 "renesas," compatible
values documented that are not directly matched by drivers.
Nowadays we have "make dtbs_check", so if a DTS doesn't conform to the
binding, it will be flagged.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
