On Fri, 8 May 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:41 PM Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 8 May 2020, Chris Brandt wrote: > > > The big argument was always that "XIP cannot be multi-platform by > > > definition because RAM/ROM always resides at different addresses in different > > > devices". And as you know, the physical address for RAM and ROM have to > > > be hard coded in the kernel binary. > > > > Exact. So what is the problem? > > Ah, you've fallen for the "multi-platform" fallacy! Me?! You must be mistaken on the person. > I have no desire to enable support for multiple platforms in a single > kernel that supports XIP on all platforms. Absolutely! As I just said in my previous email, multi-platform XIP kernels are non-sense. Nicolas
