On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 01:45:49PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If you're reverting the timeout we should revert the regulator change > > too I think. > Maybe? The main issue for me was my change was clearly breaking users > with dts with missing dependencies where their setup was working > before. I sort of feel like having a dtb with missing dependencies is > less valid than wanting to load module dependencies from userland, but > they were working first, so we have to keep them happy :) And at least > now the latter can add the timeout boot argument to make it work. > For your case, I'm not sure if the timeout would run afoul on the nfs > root mounting case this one tripped over. Given that it's basically entirely about glitching displays rather than an unrecoverable break I suspect that anyone using NFS root is some combination of unaffected or doesn't care if they see the timeout kick in.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
