Dunno why, I formatted the patch in a way others interested parties
have been removed from the Cc list, just noticed :/
It's such a minor fix I won't bother resending I think
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 07:08:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Put the device of node in case of dt parsing error.
>
> Fixes: 9eed4185c7a0 ("media: i2c: Add MAX9286 driver")
Also this is a leftover from where this was intended to be sent out a
patch on it's own
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> index 241deed0f270..bac9696f83b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ static int max9286_parse_dt(struct max9286_priv *priv)
> i2c_mux = of_find_node_by_name(dev->of_node, "i2c-mux");
> if (!i2c_mux) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to find i2c-mux node\n");
> + of_node_put(dev->of_node);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -1168,6 +1169,7 @@ static int max9286_parse_dt(struct max9286_priv *priv)
> of_fwnode_handle(node), &vep);
> if (ret) {
> of_node_put(node);
> + of_node_put(dev->of_node);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1177,6 +1179,7 @@ static int max9286_parse_dt(struct max9286_priv *priv)
> vep.bus_type);
> v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_free(&vep);
> of_node_put(node);
> + of_node_put(dev->of_node);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -1214,6 +1217,7 @@ static int max9286_parse_dt(struct max9286_priv *priv)
> priv->nsources++;
> }
> of_node_put(node);
> + of_node_put(dev->of_node);
>
> priv->route_mask = priv->source_mask;
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
