On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > > > for v5.7. > > > > > > It consists of 5 parts: > > > > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@xxxxxxxxxx / soc@xxxxxxxxxx: 2/5 and 5/5. > > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end > > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). > > Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series. > > I do see them all of them at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ? > Lore also has them: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b > > Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar > problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but > never in my (Gmail) inbox. This is how the email I got looked like: From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Linuxkernel+Patchwork-Soc via Email Integration" <patchwork-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20200226110221.19288-2-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> In-Reply-To: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: <https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub> Sender: patchwork-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List-Id: <patchwork-soc.linux.kernel.org> Mailing-List: list patchwork-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; contact patchwork-soc+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Delivered-To: mailing list <patchwork-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: patchwork-soc+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It no longer had the {arm,soc}@kernel.org recipients on it, instead the internal-only mailing list that connects soc@xxxxxxxxxx with patchwork. Very odd. Reply-to rewrites are undesirable too. Konstantin, anything on your side that can shed light on this? My mail filters locally expects to see soc@xxxxxxxxxx and arm@xxxxxxxxxx recipients still intact in the to-line, and it's really odd that 2 of the 5 emails looked as expected. -Olof
