Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] mmc: tmio: remove superfluous callback wrappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

Thanks for your patch.

On 2020-01-29 21:37:09 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> After various refactoring, we can populate the mmc_ops callbacks
> directly and don't need to have wrappers for them anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 18 ++++++++++------
>  drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c     | 32 +---------------------------
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> index 22eaabe513d0..0f07cc1aee34 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,9 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_init_tuning(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
>  		SH_MOBILE_SDHI_SCC_DTCNTL_TAPNUM_MASK;
>  }
>  
> -static void renesas_sdhi_hs400_complete(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> +static void renesas_sdhi_hs400_complete(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  {
> +	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  	struct renesas_sdhi *priv = host_to_priv(host);
>  
>  	sd_ctrl_write16(host, CTL_SD_CARD_CLK_CTL, ~CLK_CTL_SCLKEN &
> @@ -376,8 +377,9 @@ static void renesas_sdhi_reset_scc(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,
>  				     SH_MOBILE_SDHI_SCC_CKSEL));
>  }
>  
> -static void renesas_sdhi_disable_scc(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> +static void renesas_sdhi_disable_scc(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  {
> +	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  	struct renesas_sdhi *priv = host_to_priv(host);
>  
>  	renesas_sdhi_reset_scc(host, priv);
> @@ -412,9 +414,12 @@ static void renesas_sdhi_reset_hs400_mode(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,
>  			sd_ctrl_read16(host, CTL_SD_CARD_CLK_CTL));
>  }
>  
> -static void renesas_sdhi_prepare_hs400_tuning(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> +static int renesas_sdhi_prepare_hs400_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
> +	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> +
>  	renesas_sdhi_reset_hs400_mode(host, host_to_priv(host));
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  #define SH_MOBILE_SDHI_MAX_TAP 3
> @@ -899,10 +904,9 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>  		host->execute_tuning = renesas_sdhi_execute_tuning;
>  		host->check_retune = renesas_sdhi_check_scc_error;
> -		host->prepare_hs400_tuning =
> -			renesas_sdhi_prepare_hs400_tuning;
> -		host->hs400_downgrade = renesas_sdhi_disable_scc;
> -		host->hs400_complete = renesas_sdhi_hs400_complete;
> +		host->ops.prepare_hs400_tuning = renesas_sdhi_prepare_hs400_tuning;
> +		host->ops.hs400_downgrade = renesas_sdhi_disable_scc;

Would it make sens to rename renesas_sdhi_disable_scc() to 
renesas_sdhi_hs400_downgrade() to fit the pattern that it's called from 
the mmc_ops?

With or without this nit,

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +		host->ops.hs400_complete = renesas_sdhi_hs400_complete;
>  	}
>  
>  	num_irqs = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c
> index aeafa1c68ce2..a2415fb5dde0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c
> @@ -997,34 +997,7 @@ static int tmio_multi_io_quirk(struct mmc_card *card,
>  	return blk_size;
>  }
>  
> -static int tmio_mmc_prepare_hs400_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> -					 struct mmc_ios *ios)
> -{
> -	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -
> -	if (host->prepare_hs400_tuning)
> -		host->prepare_hs400_tuning(host);
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void tmio_mmc_hs400_downgrade(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> -{
> -	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -
> -	if (host->hs400_downgrade)
> -		host->hs400_downgrade(host);
> -}
> -
> -static void tmio_mmc_hs400_complete(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> -{
> -	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> -
> -	if (host->hs400_complete)
> -		host->hs400_complete(host);
> -}
> -
> -static const struct mmc_host_ops tmio_mmc_ops = {
> +static struct mmc_host_ops tmio_mmc_ops = {
>  	.request	= tmio_mmc_request,
>  	.set_ios	= tmio_mmc_set_ios,
>  	.get_ro         = tmio_mmc_get_ro,
> @@ -1033,9 +1006,6 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops tmio_mmc_ops = {
>  	.multi_io_quirk	= tmio_multi_io_quirk,
>  	.hw_reset	= tmio_mmc_hw_reset,
>  	.execute_tuning = tmio_mmc_execute_tuning,
> -	.prepare_hs400_tuning = tmio_mmc_prepare_hs400_tuning,
> -	.hs400_downgrade = tmio_mmc_hs400_downgrade,
> -	.hs400_complete	= tmio_mmc_hs400_complete,
>  };
>  
>  static int tmio_mmc_init_ocr(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux