Hi Geert-san,
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:39 AM
>
> Hi all,
>
> Despite using the same compatible values ("r8a7795"-based) because of
> historical reasons, R-Car H3 ES1.x (R8A77950) and R-Car H3 ES2.0+
> (R8A77951) are really different SoCs, with different part numbers.
>
> Hence this patch series splits the config symbols for R-Car H3, and
> renames the related DTS files, to maintain a clear separation between
> early (ES1.x) and later (ES2.0+) SoC revisions. This will pave the way
> for configuring out support for early SoC revisions, which can reduce
> kernel size, especially in the pin control subsystem.
> This is similar to the recent split of R8A7796 symbols for R-Car M3-W
> (R8A77960) and M3-W+ (R8A77961)[1], and the related DTS file renames[2],
> but different due to the sharing of compatible values between R-Car H3
> ES1.x and H3 ES2.0+.
>
> This series also includes the rename/cleanup of the ULCB DTS file names,
> as suggested by Eugeniu Rosca. As DTS files are already being renamed
> for v5.6[2], it makes sense to combine them with other renames, to avoid
> inconveniencing the user with multiple renames in multiple kernel
> versions.
>
> The pin control part will be handled in a separate patch.
>
> For your convenience, all of this is available in the
> topic/r8a7795-rename-v1 branch of my renesas-drivers git repository at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
Thank you for the patches!
Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Also I tested on both R-Car H3 ES1.1 Salvator-X and R-Car H3 ES3.0 Salvator-XS,
and the kernel can boot on these boards. So,
Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
