Hi Chris,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:38 PM Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > + reg = <0x1f800000 0x8c>, <0x20000000
> > > + 0x10000000 >;
> >
> > Any specific reason you're using 0x8c, not 0x100?
>
> Because....I keep forgetting what is the latest 'correct' size:
> A. The exact size of the register range
> or
> B. The size rounded up to look nicer
C. The size used by the on-chip address decoder providing the module's
select signal? I doubt that's not a power of two ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
