Hi Simon, On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 10:01:02AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: [..] > +1 > > Your recollection of the decisions made around H3 and 4/5 digit identifiers > matches mine. And I agree that in hindsight we may have been better to use > a 5 digit identifier for H3 ES2.0. So I think it would be a good idea to > learn from this and use a 5 digit identifier for M3-W+. We can always > register unused identifiers if the need arises. > > For may the main drawback of this approach is that it is inconsistent > with the one we took for H3, which may lead to confusion. But I think > that we are better off to favour evolution over reuse in this case. > Or in other words, it seems like a good opportunity to learn from > our mistakes. Thank you for casting your thoughts. Much appreciated. -- Best Regards, Eugeniu
