On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> pon., 8 lip 2019 o 12:24 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:45 AM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > pt., 5 lip 2019 o 18:05 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > > > +static int gpio_virt_agg_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > > > + unsigned int offset, unsigned long config)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct gpio_virt_agg_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > > > +
> > > > + chip = priv->desc[offset]->gdev->chip;
> > > > + if (chip->set_config)
> > > > + return chip->set_config(chip, offset, config);
> > > > +
> > > > + // FIXME gpiod_set_transitory() expects success if not implemented
> >
> > BTW, do you have a comment about this FIXME?
>
> Ha! Interesting. I'll give it a thought and respond elsewhere as it's
> a different subject.
>
> > > > + return -ENOTSUPP;
Upon closer look, this turns out to be a red herring: gpiod_set_transitory()
converts -ENOTSUPP to zero, so there is no issue.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
