Hi Greg, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:18:38PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Fabrizio, > > > > (CC'ing Greg as the architect of the SPDX move) > > _one of_, not the one that did the most of he work, that would be Thomas :) > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:04:27PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > > The information represented by drm_bridge_timings is also > > > needed by panels, therefore rename drm_bridge_timings to > > > drm_timings. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg43271.html > > > > > > --- > > > v1->v2: > > > * new patch > > > > > > I have copied the license from include/drm/drm_bridge.h as that's > > > where the struct originally came from. What's the right SPDX license > > > to use in this case? > > > > https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Decisions/Dealing_with_Public_Domain_within_SPDX_Files > > > > Greg, any idea on how we should handle this ? > > Ugh, what lunacy. But drm_bridge.h is NOT under any "public domain" > license, so why is that an issue here? This looks like a "normal" bsd 3 > clause license to me, right? You're right, I overread part of the text in drm_bridge.h, it seems to indeed be covered by a BSD 3 clause license. Sorry for the noise. > So I would just use "BSD-3-Clause" as the SPDX license here, if I were > doing this patch... -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
