Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:23 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > mmc/next is included in renesas-drivers anyway, but Ulf sometimes likes
> > to rebase that branch.
>
> I know :(
>
> > Actually you made it more difficult for me, as you changed the mere
> > possibility of a conflict due to Ulf rebasing mmc/next, into a certainty
> > of your branch conflicting with mmc/next ;-)
>
> Wouldn't that happen as well if I base it on an old version of mmc/next?
> As soon as Ulf rebases -> problem. Geez, his rebasing is annoying.
Yes it would, _iff_ he rebases, which he doesn't always do.
> What would be the easiest solution for you here? (except waiting for
> -rc1 which was sadly not an option here)
Base it on mmc/next? As long as Ulf doesn't rebase mmc/next, and
doesn't queue conflicting patches, there would be no conflict.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
