On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Steve Twiss wrote: > On 20 June 2019 13:29, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too > > > > Why isn't this reply attached (threaded) to the patch. > > My apologies. It wasn't my intention to split Wolfram's original e-mail thread. > > I don't usually reply using the mailto: link from lore when creating e-mails. > Outlook mustn't support the In-Reply-To header. > > I'll figure out a different way to reply in future. > > > Is your mailer broken? > > It's Windows Say no more. ;) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
