On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:52:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Support an already running watchdog by checking its enable bit and set > > up the status accordingly before registering the device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > After second thought, I am getting confused a little. If the WDT is > already running then > > a) before this patch: after successful probe, RPM will disable the > clock until userspace opens the watchdog device > > b) after this patch: during probe, our default timeout will be > programmed and because of WDOG_HW_RUNNING, the core will generate pings > until userspace opens the watchdog device. > > So, b) will protect from a crashing kernel (no pings anymore) but not > from something like missing rootfs, or? > > The usecase I had in mind ("give the kernel <x> seconds to boot into > working userspace") seems to be achieved by loading the WDT driver as a > module then, I guess? > Would https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20190605140628.618-1-rasmus.villemoes@xxxxxxxxx/ solve your use case ? Guenter