Re: [PATCH 12/12] i2c: gpio: flag atomic capability if possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 3:42 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If switching GPIOs does not sleep, then we can support atomic transfers.
>

Reviewed-by Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> index bba5c4627de3..9684a0ac2a6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         if (gpiod_cansleep(priv->sda) || gpiod_cansleep(priv->scl))
>                 dev_warn(dev, "Slow GPIO pins might wreak havoc into I2C/SMBus bus timing");
> +       else
> +               bit_data->can_do_atomic = true;
>
>         bit_data->setsda = i2c_gpio_setsda_val;
>         bit_data->setscl = i2c_gpio_setscl_val;
> --
> 2.11.0
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux