Hi Niklas, On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:42:37PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > Hi Eugenie, > > On 2019-04-11 22:28:19 +0200, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > > > Two simple questions: > > - I can only clone git://git.ragnatech.se/linux, but can't access it on > > the web, does it have some web interface? > > There should be a gitweb instance running at https://git.ragnatech.se/ > if not let me know since then something is wrong ;-) Yes, I am able to access the gitweb instance too :) > > > - Browsing through your v4l2/next/csi2/upport branch, it looks to be > > targeted for upstream. Could we rely on those commits already or > > they are still in development/testing? > > The patches in that branch are target for upstreaming but sometime > changes due to review comments. Best check the media-tree of what have > accepted and the patchwork instance if you want day fresh statuses. I > also rebase the branch from time to time on-top of the media-tree so you > should not depend on it much I'm afraid. > > If you plan to do some work on the rcar-csi2 driver you can always reach > out and check what the status is if you are unsure. Understood. Thanks. Since I've gone off-topic quite a bit already, may I have your feedback on below questions sitting in the back of my mind for some time: - There seem to be quite a number of non-mainlined rcar-vin patches sitting on top of v4.14.75-ltsi and part of rcar-3.9.x release. With some false positives, around 35-40 such commits can be identified as shown in [1]. Based on my checks, only a small subset of them are (actively) discussed in linux-media/linux-renesas-soc ML and for most of them I can't find any trace. I am just curious if there is any background force driving the upstreaming of those patches or the submissions/discussions happen rather by accident? - I am seeing two sets of rcar-vin tests [2-3] and I think there is a parent/fork relationship between them, but now they appear to be diverged. Which one would you recommend? What's the test coverage provided by these suites? Do you see room/chance for something like drivers/gpu/drm/selftests in rcar-vin in future (maybe using the upcoming kunit [4] approach?). BTW, we've been using the vsp-tests for quite some time and they've been extremely useful in pointing out regressions in our own patches. So, many thanks for sharing those too. > > -- > Regards, > Niklas Söderlund [1] git log --oneline --cherry-pick --right-only \ torvalds/master...rcar-3.9.4 -- drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/ [2] https://git.ragnatech.se/vin-tests/ [3] http://jmondi.org/git/vin-tests/ [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10704157/ Best regards, Eugeniu.
