Re: [PATCH V3 04/13] phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: Add support for r8a77470

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 09/04/19 4:50 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/13] phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: Add support for r8a77470
>>
>> Hi Biju,
>>
>> On 03/04/19 3:58 PM, Biju Das wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for r8a77470 (RZ/G1C). We can reuse this
>>> driver for initializing timing/interrupt generation registers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> V1-->V2
>>>  * Incorporated shimoda-san's review comment
>>>  Ref: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10655855/
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/phy/renesas/Kconfig              |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/renesas/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/renesas/Kconfig
>>> index e340a92..961ccb1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/renesas/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/renesas/Kconfig
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ config PHY_RCAR_GEN3_PCIE  config
>> PHY_RCAR_GEN3_USB2
>>>  	tristate "Renesas R-Car generation 3 USB 2.0 PHY driver"
>>>  	depends on ARCH_RENESAS
>>> -	depends on EXTCON
>>> +	depends on EXTCON || ARCH_R8A77470
>>>  	depends on USB_SUPPORT
>>>  	select GENERIC_PHY
>>>  	select USB_COMMON
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c
>>> b/drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c
>>> index 0a34782..ac33a02 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/renesas/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>  #include <linux/usb/of.h>
>>> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
>>>
>>>  /******* USB2.0 Host registers (original offset is +0x200) *******/
>>>  #define USB2_INT_ENABLE		0x000
>>> @@ -393,6 +394,12 @@ static const struct phy_ops
>> rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_ops = {
>>>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +static const struct phy_ops rz_g1c_phy_usb2_ops = {
>>> +	.init		= rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init,
>>> +	.exit		= rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_exit,
>>> +	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  static irqreturn_t rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_irq(int irq, void *_ch)  {
>>>  	struct rcar_gen3_chan *ch = _ch;
>>> @@ -411,6 +418,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_irq(int irq,
>>> void *_ch)  }
>>>
>>>  static const struct of_device_id rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_match_table[] = {
>>> +	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r8a77470" },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r8a7795" },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r8a7796" },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r8a77965" }, @@ -425,12 +433,18
>> @@
>>> static const unsigned int rcar_gen3_phy_cable[] = {
>>>  	EXTCON_NONE,
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +static struct soc_device_attribute soc_r8a77470[] = {
>>> +	{ .soc_id = "r8a77470" },
>>> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  static int rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
>>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>  	struct rcar_gen3_chan *channel;
>>>  	struct phy_provider *provider;
>>>  	struct resource *res;
>>> +	const struct phy_ops *phy_usb2_ops = &rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_ops;
>>>  	int irq, ret = 0;
>>>
>>>  	if (!dev->of_node) {
>>> @@ -481,7 +495,10 @@ static int rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>  	 * And then, phy-core will manage runtime pm for this device.
>>>  	 */
>>>  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>> -	channel->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL,
>> &rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_ops);
>>> +	if (soc_device_match(soc_r8a77470))
>>> +		phy_usb2_ops = &rz_g1c_phy_usb2_ops;
>>
>> Why not have the phy_ops in driver_data since you anyways have a new
>> compatible for r8a77470?
> 
> SoC device match will take care of SoC revision. We have multiple revision of SoC variants like ES1.0, ES1.1
> There is another  SoC similar to RZ/G1C known as R-Car E2X.   If you add it in compatible, it takes care only about the SoC , not the SoC revisions.

We should add that when there's really a configuration change between ES1.0 and
ES1.1. Even the phy_ops can be the same with power_on/power_off return for
r8a77470 unless you have planned to add something later.

Thanks
Kishon



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux