Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next] ravb: Avoid unsupported internal delay mode for R-Car E3/D3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:12:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> ^
> > > > +static const struct soc_device_attribute ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match[] = {
> > > > +	{ .soc_id = "r8a77990", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > > +	{ .soc_id = "r8a77995", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > > +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > I might have missed it but is there a plan to fix this in later
> > > revisions of D3/E3? I was under the impression that it is not and then
> > > we could base it on compatible rather than soc_device_match?
> > 
> > I am not aware of any such plan (or the absence of such a plan).
> > 
> > I was unsure weather to go with the compat approach of the quirk approach.
> > In the end I went with the quirk approach as it seems simpler. But
> > I'm happy to re-arrange things.
> 
> I see. Well, I don't care super much. The tiny drawback here is that we
> will have a potentially broken D3/E3 ES2.0, if they have not fixed TXID
> there. Then we need to update the above pattern. So, revision = "*" (or
> the compatible approach) might be a tad better. Then we "only" have 1G
> disabled for no reason until we whitelist it.

I do think that the quirk approach is cleaner, So all things being equal
I'd slightly prefer to stick with that approach. Shall I drop
the .revision portion?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux