On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 05:36:35PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy.
>
> drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
> index bbd73c5a4a4e..cf9ddc52f30e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/st/stm_thermal.c
> @@ -570,8 +570,7 @@ static int stm_thermal_prepare(struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor)
> static int stm_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> ret = stm_thermal_sensor_off(sensor);
> if (ret)
> @@ -585,8 +584,7 @@ static int stm_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int stm_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct stm_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> ret = stm_thermal_prepare(sensor);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
