When no alarm has been programmed on RSK-RZA1, an error message is
printed during boot:
rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: 2019-03-14T255:255:255
sh_rtc_read_alarm_value() returns 0xff when querying a hardware alarm
field that is not enabled. __rtc_read_alarm() validates the received
alarm values, and fills in missing fields when needed.
While 0xff is handled fine for the year, month, and day fields, and
corrected as considered being out-of-range, this is not the case for the
hour, minute, and second fields, where -1 is expected for missing
fields.
Fix this by returning -1 instead, as this value is handled fine for all
fields.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c
index d417b203cbc553eb..1d3de2a3d1a4d7a0 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int sh_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
static inline int sh_rtc_read_alarm_value(struct sh_rtc *rtc, int reg_off)
{
unsigned int byte;
- int value = 0xff; /* return 0xff for ignored values */
+ int value = -1; /* return -1 for ignored values */
byte = readb(rtc->regbase + reg_off);
if (byte & AR_ENB) {
--
2.17.1
