Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] i2c: core: add device-managed version of i2c_new_dummy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-03-15 22:08, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>>> I personally really dislike the proposed name. It is akin to the abomination
>>> where some sort of abbreviation of the types of variables are included also
>>> in the variable names. It's useless clutter, at least to me.
>>
>>
>> I hate to be jumping in with just a 'me-too' - but I also had a similar
>> disliking to the _errptr suffix on the function name here.
> 
> As I said to Peter, I am not exactly happy with the naming. I just
> couldn't come up with something better. I am totally open for
> suggestions here. Let's give ourselves a few days. Maybe inspiration
> will hit one of us somehow somewhen.

I can't seem to find what you said to me anywhere, it's not in my inbox and
I don't see any (other) reply from you on patchwork for this patch either.

Perhaps a resend is in order?

Cheers,
Peter





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux