On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:04:18PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > The drm_crtc_state documentation contains a subtle misspelling of the > word subtle. Correct it. > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > index 85abd3fe9e83..f2b3762636df 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct drm_plane_helper_funcs; > /** > * struct drm_crtc_state - mutable CRTC state > * > - * Note that the distinction between @enable and @active is rather subtile: > + * Note that the distinction between @enable and @active is rather subtle: > * Flipping @active while @enable is set without changing anything else may > * never return in a failure from the &drm_mode_config_funcs.atomic_check > * callback. Userspace assumes that a DPMS On will always succeed. In other > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
