Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: renesas_sdhi: prevent overflow for max_req_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I am still confused. Which upper limit do you mean then? Because for
> 
> TMIO_MAX_BLK_SIZE
> 
> > blk_size and blk_count, they are both driver specific, or?
> 
> Yes, they are driver-specific.  So you cannot use a common upper limit.

And this is why I think my patch has a valid approach. But I am still
not sure I am getting your point.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux