> + for (k = 100; k > 0; k--) {
> + if (!(sh_msiof_read(p, CTR) & mask))
> + break;
> +
> + udelay(1);
> + }
Why no reuse of sh_msiof_modify_ctr_wait? And can't we maybe even use
readl_poll_timeout() here since we know the register is fixed to CTR?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
