Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: gpio: fault-injector: add 'lose_arbitration' injector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > > > > +       wait_for_completion_interruptible(&priv->scl_irq_completion);
> > > > >
> > > > > Error checking/propagation (-ERESTARTSYS)?
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure? ERESTARTSYS belongs to the "These should never be seen by
> > > > user programs." group.
> > >
> > > How else can you inform the user the operation has been interrupted?
> >
> > Definately not by using something which is marked "should never be seen
> > by user programs" :)
> >
> > In the worst case, I'll add:
> >         if (ret) ret = -EINTR;
> >
> > I tested the current code with CTRL+C, there we get EOWNERDEAD back to
> > userspace, even with my code not propagating anything. With sending
> > SIGKILL, I got 143 which is not defined. I want to double check the
> > latter first, might be my tests were flaky...
> 
> Where's the kernel code that returns EOWNERDEAD?
> Must be hidden in a complex preprocessor macro, as git grep cannot find it :-(

I rather think it is glibc returning it when it discovered that the
owner of a robust mutex was gone:

http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pthread_mutexattr_setrobust.3.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux