Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: tmio_mmc_core: don't claim spurious interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 10:13:44PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> I have encountered an interrupt storm  during the eMMC chip probing (and
> the chip finally didn't get detected). It  turned out  that U-Boot  left
> the DMAC interrupts enabled while the  Linux driver didn't use those.
> The SDHI driver's interrupt handler somehow  assumes that, even if an
> SDIO interrupt didn't happen, it should return IRQ_HANDLED. I think that
> if none of the enabled interrupts happened and got handled, we should
> return IRQ_NONE -- that way the kernel IRQ code recoginizes a spurious
> interrupt and masks  it off pretty quickly...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks OK in general.

> +	return ireg ? true : false;

	return ireg;

?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux