Hi Magnus, On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:49 PM Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Remove undocumented IMR-LX4 device nodes > > [PATCH/RFC 01/02] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: Remove IMR-LX4 device nodes > [PATCH/RFC 02/02] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7796: Remove IMR-LX4 device nodes > > These patches take the easy way out and simply remove the undocumented > IMR-LX4 device nodes from the upstream tree. Good or bad, let me know! > > So perhaps this is a bit overly aggressive but since the DT bindings seem > undocumented and no driver exists in upstream my gut feeling says these DT > nodes were part of an upstreaming attempt that got suspended half-way through. > > In case DT binding documentation is in-flight and queued up somewhere > (ideally together with a driver) then feel free to ignore this series. > > Instead of removing nodes we could also document the DT bindings for the > IMR-LX4 devices. It would also make sense to add device nodes to other > more recent SoCs than just H3 and M3-W. But blindly adding more DT nodes > with a DT binding but without a driver seems a bit suboptimal compared to > testing against an actual driver. [PATCH v5] media: platform: Renesas IMR driver https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20170309200818.786255823@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
