Re: [PATCH 0/6] thermal: Align devm_thermal_zone_{device,of_sensor}_register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 03:08:07AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/15/2018 03:02 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:49:21AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> This patchset attempts to align devm_thermal_zone_{device,of_sensor}_register()
> >> functions and allow passing tz params to devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> >> to allow settings no_hwmon params without digging into the tz structures.
> >>
> >> The approach is as follows:
> >> 1) Add {devm_,}thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params(), which behaves just
> >>    like the old variant without _params() suffix, except it takes the struct
> >>    thermal_zone_params as an argument. The old _params()-less version of the
> >>    function is converted to use the new function and pass params = NULL.
> >>    The old _params()-less versions of the functions are retained to avoid
> >>    breaking the ABI.
> >> 2) Add the no_hwmon handling into thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params(),
> >>    that's patch 3.
> >> 3) Convert drivers from devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() with structure
> >>    diggings to devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params() without any
> >>    extra structure digging, that's the rest of the patches.
> >>
> >> Marek Vasut (6):
> >>   thermal: split thermal_zone_of_sensor_register{,_param}()
> >>   thermal: split devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register{,_param}()
> >>   thermal: Register hwmon in thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_param()
> >>   thermal: stm32: Convert to
> >>     devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params()
> >>   thermal: rcar_thermal: Convert to
> >>     devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params()
> >>   thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Register hwmon sysfs interface
> >>
> > 
> > Fix the errors reported by the bot and also please run checkpatch.pl on
> > your series.
> 
> Working on it right now. Can you look at the 0001...0003 patches and
> tell me if this is a valid approach ?

Yes, the approach seams fine to me,

> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux