Re: [PATCH] clk: vc5: Initialize src in vc5_mux_set_parent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2018 10:49 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> It seems that it may be possible to get to the regmap update call
> without ever initializing this variable, so just set it to 0 to be safe.
> 
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexey Firago <alexey_firago@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c
> index 5b393e711e94..026f76276933 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-versaclock5.c
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static int vc5_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>  	struct vc5_driver_data *vc5 =
>  		container_of(hw, struct vc5_driver_data, clk_mux);
>  	const u8 mask = VC5_PRIM_SRC_SHDN_EN_XTAL | VC5_PRIM_SRC_SHDN_EN_CLKIN;
> -	u8 src;
> +	u8 src = 0;
>  
>  	if ((index > 1) || !vc5->clk_mux_ins)
>  		return -EINVAL;

Can you rather change the else { } branch in that function such that it does

 if (vc5->clk_mux)ins == ...)
  ...
 else if (...)
  ...
+ else
+  return -EINVAL;

The last bit would assure the function would fail in case the
clk_mux_ins == 0, which can happen if someone builds a setup without any
clock into connected to the VC5 (which would not work hardware-vise).

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux