Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] rtc: pcf85363: Add support for NXP pcf85263 rtc
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:34 AM Biju Das <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] rtc: pcf85363: Add support for NXP
> > > pcf85263 rtc
> > >
> > > On 06/12/2018 15:49:57+0000, Biju Das wrote:
>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] rtc: pcf85363: Add support for NXP
> > > > > pcf85263 rtc
>
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:24 PM Biju Das
> > > > > <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] rtc: pcf85363: Add support for
> > > > > > > NXP
> > > > > > > pcf85263 rtc CC nvmem maintainer Given bytes should be 1,
> > > > > > > val should be a pointer to a single byte...
> > > > > > > What if bytes == 0?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I doubt we get "bytes==0" because of the checks in "
> > > > > drivers/nvmem/core.c"
> > > > > > Function " bin_attr_nvmem_read/ bin_attr_nvmem_write".
> > > > >
> > > > > Depends. There are other functions calling
> > > > > nvmem_reg_{read,write}(),
> > > e.g.
> > > > > nvmem_device_{read,write}().
> > > >
> > > > OK. In that case, I will return (-EINVAL) for "bytes !=1"
> > >
> > > I think it is probably better to ensure the nvmem core never passes
> > > an invalid number of bytes. All the ther RTC drivers make that
> assumption.
> >
> > In that case, I will do following checks in
> > nvmem_device_{read,write}() before calling nvmem_reg_{read,write}(),
> >
> > nvmem_device_read
> >
> > /* Stop the user from reading */
> > if (offset >= nvmem->size)
> > return 0;
> >
> > if (bytes == 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Why not 0?
Ok. Will merge with above check.
if ((offset >= nvmem->size) && (bytes == 0))
return 0;
> >
> > if (offset + bytes > nvmem->size)
>
> This might overflow, please use check_add_overflow().
Will use check_add_overflow() and then the result is compared with nvmem->size, if the check operation is successful.
> > bytes = nvmem->size - offset;
> >
> > nvmem_device_write
> >
> > /* Stop the user from writing */
> > if (offset >= nvmem->size)
> > return -EFBIG;
>
> ENOSPC?
OK, Will change it to ENOSPC.
> + same comments as for read.
>
> Oh, and offset is unsigned int instead of loff_t.
> Nobody's envisioning nvmem devices larger than 4 GiB?
Regards,
Biju
[https://www2.renesas.eu/media/email/unicef.jpg]
This Christmas, instead of sending out cards, Renesas Electronics Europe have decided to support Unicef with a donation. For further details click here<https://www.unicef.org/> to find out about the valuable work they do, helping children all over the world.
We would like to take this opportunity to wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year.
Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.
