Hi Jacopo,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:58 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:35 AM Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > VIN data groups may appear on different sets of pins, usually named
> > "vinX_data_[a|b]". The existing VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() does not support
> > appending the '_a' or '_b' suffix, leading to the definition of groups
>
> group
>
> > names not consistent with the ones defined using SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP() macro.
>
> the SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP() macro.
>
> >
> > Fix this by adding making the VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP macro a variadic one,
>
> Please drop "adding".
> VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP()
>
> > which accepts an optional 'version' argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Perhaps it makes sense to add
Fixes: 423caa52534ff15a ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a779[01]: Move 'union
vin_data' to shared header file")
to make sure it gets backported with the SoC-specific fixes that depend on it?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
