On 21/10/2018 22:00, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy.
>
> drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
> index be637e6b01d2..b2bbdf6eb02b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/st/st_thermal.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(st_thermal_unregister);
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int st_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> return st_thermal_sensor_off(sensor);
> }
> @@ -286,8 +285,7 @@ static int st_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int st_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct st_thermal_sensor *sensor = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> ret = st_thermal_sensor_on(sensor);
> if (ret)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
