Hi Fabrizio,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:10 PM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are cases when the bootloader configures a pin to work
> as a function rather than GPIO, and other cases when the pin
> is configured as a function at POR.
> This commit makes sure the pin is configured as a GPIO the
> moment we need it to work as an interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> RFC->PATCH:
> * Moved gc->request to the bottom of gpio_rcar_irq_set_type
Thanks for the update!
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static int gpio_rcar_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct gpio_rcar_priv *p = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> + int err;
>
> dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "sense irq = %d, type = %d\n", hwirq, type);
>
> @@ -176,6 +177,13 @@ static int gpio_rcar_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + err = gc->request(gc, hwirq);
Call gpio_rcar_request() directly?
Where should the matching gpio_rcar_free() be called?
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&p->pdev->dev, "Can't request GPIO %d from %s\n", hwirq,
%u for unsigned int
> + gc->label);
> + return err;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
