On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:51 AM Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:19:51AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:00:27PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via > > > platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. > > Thanks! > > > > I see only 3 out of 5 patches. > > > > Since we are about to establish a separate tree as well as an additional record > > in MAINTAINERS data base for Intel pinctrl driver, I ask you to resend only > > Intel related stuff in a separate series. > > Well, it is easy enough to apply to our tree even if part of larger > series :) So no need to resend anything IMHO. I think it's slightly harder to sort things out for the more complex series, anyway, I'm right now talking to Wolfram and he shared how he did this series. The split is based on records in MAINTAINERS data base, that's why we have non-Intel parts there. Whenever we push new record, this automatically fixes the split. > Looks good to me, > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
