Hi Simon, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:51 AM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is intended as a submission to LTSI-4.14. It is the backport > of a fixes for safe DMA buffer handling for the SH-Mobile I2C driver > and I2C code. All patches are present in v4.19-rc3. > > This pull-request is based on > "[GIT PULL LTSI-4.14] LTSI-v4.14 Backport or I2C R-Car Fix" > tagged as backport/v4.14.61/snapshot-to-v4.18+fixes-flattened, > which I have already sent a pull-request for. > > There are 10 patches. > > I have performed build testing of this backports on a wide range of > defconfigs and I am not aware of any regressions over v4.14.40 (the > baseline chosen when this work began). > > > The following changes since commit 4d4605e5c137ed9a53582e573118cbc16b82cbf1: > > i2c: rcar: implement STOP and REP_START according to docs (2018-08-28 13:35:06 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas-backport.git backport/v4.14.61/snapshot-to-v4.18+fixes-v2-flattened > > for you to fetch changes up to 720043a4efbb3356db116d084c7b877ad41ee51a: > > i2c: sh_mobile: fix leak when using DMA bounce buffer (2018-09-17 15:54:30 +0200) Thank, this all looks fine to me. I subjected this to the same testing I do for each renesas-drivers release. I have detected no regressions[*]. [*] The only regression I'm aware of is a regression in 4.14-stable, which can be fixed by "tick/nohz: Prevent bogus softirq pending warning". (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/979451/). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
