Re: [PATCH/RFT] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Add MSIOF pins, groups and functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert-san,

Thanks for your review!

2018年9月6日(木) 0:01 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi Kaneko-san,
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:22 PM Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch adds MSIOF{0,1,2,3} pins, groups and functions to R8A77995 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > This patch is based on the devel branch of Simon Horman's renesas tree.
>
> Which is the wrong tree. According to MAINTAINERS:
>
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
> sh-pfc

I will re-base this patch to the correct tree.

>
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c
>
> > @@ -1277,6 +1281,289 @@ enum {
>
> > +/* - MSIOF1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- */
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_clk_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SCK */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 16),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_clk_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_SCK_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_sync_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SYNC */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 19),
> > +};
>
> msiof1_ss2_mux[] should be here.

msiof1_sync_mux ?

>
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_ss1_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SS1 */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 25),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_ss1_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_SS1_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_ss2_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SS2 */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 22),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_ss2_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_SS2_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_sync_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_SYNC_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_txd_pins[] = {
> > +       /* TXD */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 17),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_txd_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_TXD_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_rxd_pins[] = {
> > +       /* RXD */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(4, 18),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof1_rxd_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF1_RXD_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* - MSIOF2 ----------------------------------------------------------------- */
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_clk_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SCK */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 3),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_clk_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_SCK_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_sync_a_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SYNC */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 6),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_sync_a_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_SYNC_A_MARK,
> > +};
>
> I would move the msiof2_sync_b definition here.

Will do.

>
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_ss1_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SS1 */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 7),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_ss1_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_SS1_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_ss2_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SS2 */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 8),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_ss2_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_SS2_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_sync_b_pins[] = {
> > +       /* SYNC */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 2),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_sync_b_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_SYNC_B_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_txd_pins[] = {
> > +       /* TXD */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 4),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_txd_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_TXD_MARK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_rxd_pins[] = {
> > +       /* RXD */
> > +       RCAR_GP_PIN(0, 5),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned int msiof2_rxd_mux[] = {
> > +       MSIOF2_RXD_MARK,
> > +};
>
> > @@ -1752,6 +2039,37 @@ enum {
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_data4),
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_data8),
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(mmc_ctrl),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_clk),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_sync),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_ss1),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_ss2),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_rxd),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof0_txd),
>
> Please use the same order as the msiof*_pins[] arrays above.

Will do.

>
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_clk),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_sync),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_ss1),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_ss2),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_rxd),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof1_txd),
>
> Likewise.
>
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_clk),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_sync_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_ss1),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_ss2),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_sync_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_rxd),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof2_txd),
>
> Likewise.
>
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_clk_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_sync_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_ss1_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_ss2_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_txd_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_rxd_a),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_clk_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_sync_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_ss1_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_ss2_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_rxd_b),
> > +       SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(msiof3_txd_b),
>
> Likewise.
>
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(pwm0_a),
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(pwm0_b),
> >         SH_PFC_PIN_GROUP(pwm0_c),
> > @@ -1982,6 +2300,49 @@ enum {
> >         "vin4_clk",
> >  };
> >
> > +static const char * const msiof0_groups[] = {
> > +       "msiof0_clk",
> > +       "msiof0_sync",
> > +       "msiof0_ss1",
> > +       "msiof0_ss2",
> > +       "msiof0_rxd",
> > +       "msiof0_txd",
>
> Please use the same order as the msiof*_pins[] arrays above.

Will do.

>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const msiof1_groups[] = {
> > +       "msiof1_clk",
> > +       "msiof1_sync",
> > +       "msiof1_ss1",
> > +       "msiof1_ss2",
> > +       "msiof1_rxd",
> > +       "msiof1_txd",
>
> Likewise.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const msiof2_groups[] = {
> > +       "msiof2_clk",
> > +       "msiof2_sync_a",
> > +       "msiof2_ss1",
> > +       "msiof2_ss2",
> > +       "msiof2_sync_b",
> > +       "msiof2_rxd",
> > +       "msiof2_txd",
>
> Likewise.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const msiof3_groups[] = {
> > +       "msiof3_clk_a",
> > +       "msiof3_sync_a",
> > +       "msiof3_ss1_a",
> > +       "msiof3_ss2_a",
> > +       "msiof3_txd_a",
> > +       "msiof3_rxd_a",
> > +       "msiof3_clk_b",
> > +       "msiof3_sync_b",
> > +       "msiof3_ss1_b",
> > +       "msiof3_ss2_b",
> > +       "msiof3_rxd_b",
> > +       "msiof3_txd_b",
>
> Likewise.
>
> > +};
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>

Best regards,
Kaneko

> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux