On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:33:58AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote: > Hi again Sakari, > sorry, I'm confusing you > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote: > > Hi Sakari, > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based > > > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one > > > > sensor driver used by one of those boards. > > > > > > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know > > > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework. > > > > > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU > > > driver is the last using SoC camera framework. > > > > > The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in > v4.19-rc2. Oh; I missed this entirely. I thought it'd be merge later as there were comments. Anyway it's good it's in. :-) > > Sorry for the confusion. > > The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one > removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323 Given this series is in the current Linus's tree, that seems like a no-brainer now. > > Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's > probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far, > I haven't heard from them. > > I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send. If you have further changes, please make them in separate patches. -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx
