Hi Kieran, I appreciate the detailed reply zooming in into many aspects (both technical and related to process/workflow) of contributing/reviewing patches. I take it as is. I could elaborate on specific parts of it, like applying the "undefined behavior" term (which comes from the world of compilers) to the software we write. This doesn't sound right to me, since our software is guided by our own requirements and one of this requirements is (should be) predictable and safe behavior given some junky/incomplete DTS configuration. If any bugs exist dealing with nonsense configuration, IMHO they should be fixed in the driver. Since my purpose is simply seeing the patches in upstream the way maintainers like them best, I will put little to no time discussing this and will mainly focus on submitting any changes requested by the reviewers. Thanks, Eugeniu.
