Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio_mmc_core: don't claim spurious interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Should come after Yamada-san's patches, I'd think.
> 
>    What are these?

A more complex series adding another SDHI user.

> > BTW Sergei, did you test with SDIO devices?
> 
>    No. But I really think the current code is borked. If you don't have an interrupt
> to handle, you should idicate that.

I think the patch is justified, I am not talking about that. I just
wondered if you tested it. So, you are not missing something in the SDIO
code path which you changed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux