Hi Geert,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:15:37PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Eugeniu,
>
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:14 AM Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > According to R-Car Gen3 HW manual rev0.55E, R-Car M3-N has two CAN
> > interfaces, similar to H3, M3-W and other SoCs from the same family.
> >
> > Add CAN nodes to avoid below r8a77965-ulcb-kf.dtb build failure:
> > Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/ulcb-kf.dtsi:19.1-6 Label or path can0 not found
> > Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/ulcb-kf.dtsi:25.1-6 Label or path can1 not found
> >
> > CAN support is inspired from below commits:
> > - v4.7 commit 308b7e4ba62e ("arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CAN support")
> > - v4.11 commit 909c16252415 ("arm64: dts: r8a7796: Add CAN support")
> > - v4.12 commit bec0948e810f ("arm64: dts: r8a7796: Add reset control properties")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Have you actually tested CAN operation, or were you just fixing the
> build failure?
> In case of the latter, please just add minimal placeholders, like were present
> for other device nodes in early versions of r8a77965.dtsi.
Same as replied to Kieran, I will add some skeleton nodes for can0 and
can1, just to avoid DTC errors. It was not my goal to do CAN bring-up.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Best regards,
Eugeniu.
