On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:38 PM Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 5 August 2018 02:11:02 EEST Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > > In the context of M3N-ULCB (RTP0RC77965SKBX010SA00) board bring-up, it's
> > > rather pointless to add a new "renesas,m3nulcb" compatible string. Any
> > > SoC-level differences between the two variants of ULCB (M3 and M3-N)
> > > should be successfully covered by making use of existing
> > > "renesas,r8a7796" and "renesas,r8a77965" compatibles.
> > >
> > > Prior to adding M3-N Starter Kit to the list, rename:
> > > - "renesas,h3ulcb" => "renesas,ulcb"
> > > - "renesas,m3ulcb" => "renesas,ulcb"
> >
> > This bothers me more than the naming convention in patch 01/14, as this change
> > would completely hide differences between the H3 and M3-N versions of the
> > ULCB. Compatible strings are listed in a decreasing order of specificity, and
> > having "renesas,ulcb" as the most-specific compatible string means that the
> > two boards are supposed to be identical, while they are not.
>
> AFAIK the boards are identical (cfr. ), except for the SiP mounted.
> Cfr. e.g. the combined R-Car_StarterKit_Gen3_H3_M3_DEV_Rev.053.pdf
> ("Renesas R-Car H3/M3 Device Manual", incl. schematics).
Sorry, the schematics are in a separate file
R-Car_StarterKit_Gen3_SCH_Rev.110.pdf
with title "R-Car_Gen3 Starterkit", for both the Pro and Premier versions.
But "ULCB" is an unofficial name.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
