Hi Eugeniu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 02:11:04 EEST Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> Following the recent change in dt-bindings [1], switch from
> "renesas,h3ulcb" to "renesas,ulcb" compatible string.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts index
> 06deb67c36c8..7a5b1dc64090 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts
> @@ -14,6 +14,6 @@
>
> / {
> model = "Renesas H3ULCB Kingfisher board based on r8a7795 ES1.x";
> - compatible = "shimafuji,kingfisher", "renesas,h3ulcb",
> + compatible = "shimafuji,kingfisher", "renesas,ulcb",
> "renesas,r8a7795";
This is unrelated to your patch, but due to the reason explained in my review
of 02/14, I think "shimafuji,kingfisher" should include the SoC name.
This brings up the topic of how to describe boards that are made of an SoC
"module" board plugged into an expansion "motherboard".
> };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
