Hi Morimoto-san, Thank you for your comments. On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:33:34AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Hi Eugeniu > > > In the context of M3N-ULCB (RTP0RC77965SKBX010SA00) board bring-up, it's > > rather pointless to add a new "renesas,m3nulcb" compatible string. Any > > SoC-level differences between the two variants of ULCB (M3 and M3-N) > > should be successfully covered by making use of existing > > "renesas,r8a7796" and "renesas,r8a77965" compatibles. > > > > Prior to adding M3-N Starter Kit to the list, rename: > > - "renesas,h3ulcb" => "renesas,ulcb" > > - "renesas,m3ulcb" => "renesas,ulcb" > > I'm not sure detail, but > does it mean, both H3/M3 board can boot/work with > "renesas,ulcb" compatible if we had such driver/soc ? First, assuming latest vanilla v4.18-rc8 kernel, neither "renesas,salvator-x[s]" nor "renesas,(m3|h3)ulcb" compatibles are used anywhere outside of DTS and DT bindings documentation: $ git grep -E --name-only "renesas,(h3ulcb|m3ulcb|salvator-x)" | xargs dirname | sort -u arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm Since there is no driver using these compatibles, no functional breakage is expected by changing the compatible format/name. Secondly, as pointed out in the commit summary line and description, there is an overlap in scope between the SoC-level compatibles and ULCB board-level compatibles, which doesn't happen for Salvator-X{S} targets and creates some inconsistency. This inconsistency now spawns debates about how other ULCB-based board compatibles should be named and for that single reason IMO should be fixed. Lastly, I don't think any driver will ever need to use "renesas,(m3|m3n|h3)ulcb" string, since it is too broad. On/off-chip IP-oriented compatibles are probably better candidates for that. > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > > index d8cf740132c6..f391dba10574 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Boards: > > compatible = "renesas,gose", "renesas,r8a7793" > > - H3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Premier, RTP0RC7795SKBX0010SA00 (H3 ES1.1)) > > H3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Premier, RTP0RC77951SKBX010SA00 (H3 ES2.0)) > > - compatible = "renesas,h3ulcb", "renesas,r8a7795" > > + compatible = "renesas,ulcb", "renesas,r8a7795" > > - Henninger > > compatible = "renesas,henninger", "renesas,r8a7791" > > - iWave Systems RZ/G1C Single Board Computer (iW-RainboW-G23S) > > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Boards: > > - Lager (RTP0RC7790SEB00010S) > > compatible = "renesas,lager", "renesas,r8a7790" > > - M3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Pro, RTP0RC7796SKBX0010SA09 (M3 ES1.0)) > > - compatible = "renesas,m3ulcb", "renesas,r8a7796" > > + compatible = "renesas,ulcb", "renesas,r8a7796" > > - Marzen (R0P7779A00010S) > > compatible = "renesas,marzen", "renesas,r8a7779" > > - Porter (M2-LCDP) > > My opinion is that if you want to exchange compatible name, > related all driver/document should be exchanged in same patch. AFAIK Simon maintains a number of branches hosting solely the DT bindings. More precisely it is the "dt-bindings-for-v4.*" branch series in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git For that reason, IMO it might be worth to detach the document updates from DTS updates. I have no problems squashing the DTS and doc patches into one single commit, but before doing that I would appreciate a confirmation from the maintainer. Anyhow, many thanks for your feedback! > > For example, above "h3ulcb" case, patch subject indicates > "rename h3ulcb" or something, and it include [03/14][04/14][05/14][06/14]. > Same for m3 It was my impression that the DTS patches are always partitioned per-file, to avoid misleading globbing patterns in the commit subjects and allow easier DTS commit porting to future SoCs/boards. I will gladly follow your suggestion once I get the confirmation from maintainer. Thank you very much! Best regards, Eugeniu.