On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 02:46:20PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:04:41PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC DT updates for v4.19. > > > > > > The following changes since commit ce397d215ccd07b8ae3f71db689aedb85d56ab40: > > > > Linux 4.18-rc1 (2018-06-17 08:04:49 +0900) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git tags/renesas-arm-dt-for-v4.19 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 8757b1eb3ff92012be1670a0f0d2cf9f3d9a17ff: > > > > ARM: dts: r8a77470: Use r8a77470-cpg-mssr binding definitions (2018-07-18 10:47:01 +0200) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Renesas ARM Based SoC DT Updates for v4.19 > > > > * RZ/G1C (r8a77470) SoC > > > > Use r8a77470-cpg-mssr binding definitions, which are now available in > > mainline, instead of numeric indices. > > I shorted this up a bit to "RZ/G1C (r8a77470) SoC: Use r8a77470-cpg-mssr > binding definitions" > > > * Add GR-Peach audio camera shield support with MT9V111 image sensor > > > > This allows use of this shield with the RZ/A1 (r7s72100) SoC based > > GR-Peach board. > > This second paragraph is redundant. > > > * Add initial support for RZ/N1D (r9a06g032) SoC and its RZN1D-DB board > > > > * Use SPDX identifiers in DT for all SoCs and boards > > > > * Add missing OPP properties for all CPUs on various SoCs > > > > This fixes SoCs where OPP properties were only defined for CPU0 > > which allows correct operation regardless of the order in which > > CPUs are brought up. > > Pruned this out too, description is clear enough (we've seen a bunch of these > patches by now :). > > > * Drop MTD partitioning from DT > > > > This does not describe HW and providing partitioning on the kernel > > command line provides a more flexible solution. > > I disagree that command line is to be preferred. It's awkward to keep > it updated everywhere, and for your product you're unlikely to change > the partition scheme very often. But it's up to you, I suppose. Seems > like needless churn though. > > Device-tree is there to describe the _platform_, and sure, flash partitioning > isn't part of the pure hardware, but it is non-probable and we've got the > tradition of keeping those things in the DT. > > I've also replied to the patch, let's bring the discussion there. > > > * Add missing PMIC nodes to R-Car Gen2 M2-W (r8a7791) based porter board > > > > This describes the two PMIC devices present on the porter and > > connects CPU DVS supply. > > Again, no need for the paragraph in the tag, I'd say. > > > Not merged this branch based on the above MTD comments. Thanks, I'll post a v2 with the MTD change dropped and updates to the commit message as per your suggestions.
