Re: [PATCH 0/3] sh_eth: fix & clean up sh_eth_soft_swap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sergei,

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's a set of 3 patches against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo. First one fixes an
> old buffer endiannes issue (luckily, the ARM SoCs are smart enough to not actually
> care) plus couple clean ups around sh_eth_soft_swap()...
>
> [1/1] sh_eth: make sh_eth_soft_swap() work on ARM
> [2/3] sh_eth: uninline sh_eth_soft_swap()
> [3/3] sh_eth: use DIV_ROUND_UP() in sh_eth_soft_swap()

Does the swapping actually work?
In sh_eth_rx(), it's called before dma_unmap_single(), without calling
dma_sync_single_for_cpu() first.
Shouldn't it be called after the unmap instead?

In addition, why is it passed the dma_addr converted to virt, while the skb
address is available?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux