Hi Geert, On 25 May 2018 10:13 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: [snip] > Now, given the clock definitions for RZ/N1[DSL] are the same (although some > don't exist on some variants), you could keep on using RZN1_CLK_FOO for > the names of the defines, and store them in a common file, included by the > soc-specific file. But please make clear the common file cannot be included > directly, so the filename does not become part of the DT ABI, and you are > shielded from future marketing silliness (e.g. next quarter's RZ/N1X being > totally different). How does an include filename become part of the DT ABI? I thought the dtb is the ABI, not the dts. Am I wrong? Thanks Phil
