On 05/30/2018 07:21 AM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > Hi, Marek > > On 05/26, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 05/26/2018 11:16 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: >>> Hi Marek, >>> >>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: >>> >>> [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next] >>> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6] >>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] >>> >>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613 >>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next >>> config: x86_64-randconfig-x002-201820 (attached as .config) >>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 >>> reproduce: >>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>> >>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >>> >>> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:10:0, >>> from drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:16: >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function 'da9063_regulator_probe': >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^ >>> include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' >>> if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \ >>> ^~~~ >>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^ >>> include/linux/compiler.h:58:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' >>> if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \ >>> ^~~~ >>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^ >>> include/linux/compiler.h:69:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' >>> ______r = !!(cond); \ >>> ^~~~ >>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if' >>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) >>> ^~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:749:10: error: 'struct da9063' has no member named 'model' >>> da9063->model); >>> ^~ >>> >>> vim +/if +744 drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c >> >> Is it testing this patch without the other patches in the series or at >> least 1/6 ? > > It was tested with the whole patch series as you can see in https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613. Ha, I see the problem. Thanks for confirming it's checked with the whole series. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
